Skip to main content

Understanding "Emotional Intelligence" (or EQ) to Build Great Teams

Let me tell you… This has been my favourite subject of all! Not that I may want to do research in psychology but understanding people and how they behave so differently in different situations - just puts me in awe!

So… What is EQ?

A very nicely written post from psychcentral (Psych Central Link) aptly explains EQ as well as its 5 categories (or components), which are –
  1. Self-awareness
  2. Self-regulation
  3. Motivation
  4. Empathy
  5. Social Skills

With even more detail, positivepsychologyprogram (Positive Psychology Program Link) provides even more details with the 4 dimensions of EQ, which for ‘emotions’ are –

  1. Perceiving
  2. Using
  3. Understanding
  4. Managing

For further exploration on EQ, starting with Wikipedia (Wikipedia Link) is a great idea, since it also talks about the 3 models of Emotional Intelligence (or also referred to as EQ). The above 5 categories are coming from the “Mixed Model”.

I am quite influenced by the ‘Mixed Model’ than other models. It is much more comprehensive and connects with a 360-degree assessment. EQ is a great helper when doing appraisals for employees, but ONLY if it is done in the correct-way! Please await a separate write-up on this one.

For the 5 categories given above, a common and important trait of “awareness” runs across.

You shall find many trickles of this trait in the below paragraphs.

Why is EQ so important to build great teams?

In many articles online, I see one common conclusion – ‘EQ is more important than IQ’. In our daily work, when two or more people form a team, they need to work closely to resolve many issues, share knowledge to enrich and create a high-quality outcome. This cannot happen without an environment, that promotes –

  1. Respect for individual viewpoints and ideas
  2. Ease and openness of communication
  3. Freedom to individuals, and trust with responsibilities
  4. Ethical responsibility and actions
  5. Learning of new domains, processes and technology

Such an environment can be created, only with individuals who have the right ‘EQ’ (or attitude / mindset) for growth. A culture of positivity and growth is extremely important for individuals to give their best and remain motivated.

How can understanding ‘EQ’ help build great teams?

Many organizations look for leaders (and visionaries), who help create an organization culture, that promotes the kind of environment given above. Such leaders inspire and put the team ahead of them to achieve a common goal.

Some of the most important pointers to build great teams, that I have experienced are –
  1. Nurture leadership or hire leaders, who ‘walk-the-talk’ and understand their team based on their temperaments. Individuals come with a domination across the four personality types (Sanguine, Phlegmatic, Choleric and Melancholic). A mix of these provide clues of their dominating behavior. A matured leader understands this and behaves appropriately.
  2. Get individuals in a team (when hiring or moving), with a good variation in the number of years of experience. This helps the group do self-management (to resolve conflicts, build credibility, learn from others experience and get the right challenges forming inter-personal relationships).
  3. Provide strong support systems (processes and technology), that can strengthen the foundation of an enabling environment.
  4. Accept failures from individuals as a stepping-stone, for everybody to learn and move forward. Evaluate the ability for individuals to come-out and do better after failures. A smart use of failures to create organization-level best-practices indicates a culture of positivity and growth.
- Written by Anand Nanavati (SupraDigit Solutions)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reduce Your App Development Costs by More than 50% by "Simply Preventing Bugs"!

"Be a yardstick of quality. Some people aren’t used to an environment where excellence is expected.”— Steve Jobs Everybody loves to avoid a disaster, but there is a “proactive” effort to do activities that can prevent a disaster from happening. Most of the executives do not want to “get involved” in such “proactive” efforts, simply due to the love of fixing urgencies Or having a mindset that it’s not important.   I remember, when once I was working with the Quality Assurance team on a product. The development team simply refused to spend efforts on the most essential “unit testing” for their developed components! The intent was to release the software to the QA team as soon as possible and focus more on so-called “core development”. Over the years, looking at multitude of projects failing in-spite of highly experienced resources, reasonable time and the intent, I have uncovered that, prevention is the “Most Important” and “Ignored” part of software development. Why should we

Change the World by Keeping Your Inner Fire Ignited

A decade back, when I was working on a huge enterprise program (with multiple projects) along with a big team (of close to 300 people), we were a group of managers who were evaluated and pushed by the senior management to “proactively” deal with issues and to work on finding new solutions. I used to think of how - we can become “proactive”, when we were already focusing our efforts on fighting our daily “fires” or urgencies of our project work. When I delved deeper into our daily work habits, it struck me that till the time we are not excited about “getting things done”, the willingness to explore more out of our comfort zone just doesn’t happen. The innate human behaviour is to follow a routine and establish a comfort zone over a period. The 1st factor – “an external stimulus” can upset us and force us to think or act out of our comfort zone.  The 2nd factor that can make us “move” out of our comfort zones is about having an excitement of a future or coming up with a vision th

The Confusion Between Software “Metrics” Vs “Matrix”

When I was studying in class 10 th , I asked my English teacher a very basic question about why two words in English sound the same but mean different. That time, we never had a separate subject on “phonetics” and I was quite unaware of this part of the English subject then. She smiled and very smartly told me that – “English is a ‘funny’ language” and went away! I was amused by her answer the whole time. Only later I learnt that in English there are so many words with a spelling, that are used “as per the context” to mean different than their similar sounding words with a different spelling. In quality assurance and in general in project management, many testers and project managers make the same mistake with a misunderstanding and confusing these 2 words – “Metrics” and “Matrix”. They use them interchangeably! Metrics in the quality management context means “to measure” (check its meaning here - https://www.dictionary.com/browse/metric) and … Matrix has different meanings based o